September 29, 2016
Bryan K. Wheelock
Principal
St. Louis Metro Office
720 Recent Articles
September 29, 2016
Let the Punishment Fit the Crime
September 23, 2016
Function Claim Language Shows That Claims are Directed to Abstract Idea, Not a Concrete Technical Innovation
September 23, 2016
Stripped of Excess Verbiage, Claim Directed to Streaming Out-of-Region Media to Cell Phones in an Abstract Idea
September 23, 2016
Structural Element Does Not Make Method Claims Indefinite
September 22, 2016
It was Error Not to Consider Secondary Considerations, But They Wouldn’t Have Made a Difference
September 21, 2016
Federal Circuit Remands Issue of Enhanced Damages for Determination Whether this was an Egregious Case of Misconduct Beyond Typical Infringement
September 20, 2016
Inherent Disclosure is Sufficient to Support a Priority Claim
September 17, 2016
Backgrounds — The Less Said the Better
September 16, 2016
Substantial Evidence Supported Infringement of Limitations That Did Not Need Construction
September 16, 2016
PTAB Decision to Institute Despite Alleged § 315 Time Bar is Not Reviewable
September 13, 2016
Read Our Lips: Not Everything is Abstract
September 06, 2016
The Intellectual Property Owner’s Manual
August 30, 2016
Claim Narrowed by Specification is Saved from Indefiniteness but too Narrow to be Infringed
August 30, 2016
Compliance with PTAB’s Requirements for Motion to Amend Arbitrary and Capricious?
August 15, 2016
Broad Original Claims Prevent Invalidity for Lack of Adequate Written Description
August 11, 2016
PTAB Misapplied Common Sense in Finding Claims Obvious
August 11, 2016
District Court Correctly Added Inventors Who Contributed to at least one Claim Element
August 09, 2016
BRI Does Not Apply if Patent Expires Any Time During Reexamination Proceeding
August 09, 2016