Harness IP
  • People
  • Global IP Services
    • Practice Areas
    • Industries
    • Case Studies
  • Blog
  • News & Awards
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 中國語
  • Client Login
  • 한국어
  • 日本語
  • 中國語

Blog

Subscribe to our Blogs

  • Subscribe to our Blogs

Harness IP takes pride in our collective knowledge of intellectual property law and how it affects businesses and organizations across a range of industries. We also enjoy keeping up with the latest decisions from the prominent venues that affect IP law, including the Federal Circuit, the U.S. Supreme Court, and the PTAB. Our goal is to distill this knowledge into practical guidance that in-house counsel and others can use. We invite you to join our audience and enrich the discussion whenever possible. 

  • Litigation

      ALL CATEGORIES

      • Biologics & Biosimilars
        • FDA Guidance & Updates
      • BioPharma
      • Blockchain, Crypto, & Web 3.0
      • Chemistry & Nanotechnology
      • EDMO Patent Updates
      • Fitness IP
      • IP Management
      • IPR-PGR
      • Litigation
      • Patent Prosecution
      • quIPs
      • Trademarks
      • Uncategorized
  • Authors
    • Caley BennettCaley Bennett 1
    • Jewell N. BriggsJewell N. Briggs 8
    • John A. Castellano, IIIJohn A. Castellano, III 1
    • Christopher M. CaubleChristopher M. Cauble 5
    • Matthew L. CutlerMatthew L. Cutler 201
    • Keith P. DriscollKeith P. Driscoll 1
    • Nicholas S. DrysdaleNicholas S. Drysdale 7
    • Monte L. FalcoffMonte L. Falcoff 3
    • Glenn E. ForbisGlenn E. Forbis 12
    • Charlie Franklin, Ph.D.Charlie Franklin, Ph.D. 1
    • Alexandra M. FuchsAlexandra M. Fuchs 2
    • Michael GambleMichael Gamble 1
    • Jordyn GraweJordyn Grawe 10
    • Jason A. HeistJason A. Heist 1
    • Paul R. HofferPaul R. Hoffer 2
    • Michael P. KellaMichael P. Kella 4
    • Hemant M. KeskarHemant M. Keskar 4
    • Sung Pil KimSung Pil Kim 1
    • Elisabeth A. KoralElisabeth A. Koral 11
    • Kisuk LeeKisuk Lee 2
    • J. Bradley (Brad) LuchsingerJ. Bradley (Brad) Luchsinger 1
    • Chris K. MillerChris K. Miller 1
    • Leanne M. RakersLeanne M. Rakers 36
    • Douglas A. RobinsonDouglas A. Robinson 18
    • Joel R. SamuelsJoel R. Samuels 16
    • Mark A. SpinelliMark A. Spinelli 1
    • David L. SuterDavid L. Suter 2
    • Michael L. TaylorMichael L. Taylor 1
    • Jennifer R. TurchynJennifer R. Turchyn 4
    • David P. UtykanskiDavid P. Utykanski 1
    • Michael VarcoMichael Varco 4
    • Joseph E. Walsh, Jr.Joseph E. Walsh, Jr. 4
    • Andrew M. WaxmanAndrew M. Waxman 2
    • Bryan K. WheelockBryan K. Wheelock 719
    • Jennifer M. Woodside WojtalaJennifer M. Woodside Wojtala 12
    • Scott E. YackeyScott E. Yackey 1
  • CLS Newsletter

    April 4, 2025

    U.S. Chemical & Life Science Patents Quarterly Newsletter

    More

  • Patent infringement

    April 1, 2025

    Do You Have a Patent Infringement Problem?

    More

  • Protecting-Your-Cannabis-Brands_Harness-IP

    January 2, 2025

    Navigating Complex Federal Regulations When Protecting Your Cannabis Brands

    More

  • FDA NIH | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

    December 16, 2024

    20 March 2024 USPTO Alert: USPTO ensures robust and reliable patents through examiner training on searching for prior art in FDA and NIH databases

    More

  • The 7 Things You Don’t Say (In Writing) When Your Company is Accused of Patent Infringement

    November 19, 2024

    The 7 Things You Don’t Say (In Writing) When Your Company is Accused of Patent Infringement

    More

  • Don’t Disclaim-Away the Broader Claims in Your Continuation

    November 19, 2024

    Don’t Disclaim-Away the Broader Claims in Your Continuation Patent Application

    More

Pharma Patent Attorney Harness Dickey | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

October 30, 2019

Synthesizing and Screening Thousands of Candidate Compounds Constitutes Undue Experimentation

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness IP IP Lawyers

October 9, 2019

Oral Arguments in Peter v. NantKwest Suggest History and SCOTUS Favor Applicant’s Position that Attorneys’ Fees Are Not “Expenses”

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness IP Patent Litigation PTAB Review

October 4, 2019

Hope is not Enough to Create a Reasonable Expectation of Success

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

self inflating tire patent lawsuit 1 | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

October 3, 2019

When They Came for My Software and Medicine, I did Nothing; “Monstrous” Law Now Targets Mechanical Arts

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness IP patent Attorneys Detroit St. Louis Dallas Washington, DC

September 25, 2019

Board Misreads Features of the Claims, Fails to Appreciate a Technical Solution to a Technical Problem

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Design Patents Harness Dickey | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

September 12, 2019

Federal Circuit Holds that a Basket is Not a Chair

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey Federal Circuit Litigation | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

September 12, 2019

Objective Indicia of Non-obviousness Supported PTAB’s Finding of Non-obviousness

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

mage of cracked light bulb to denote IP legal dispute

August 16, 2019

Patent Eligibility Can be Determined on the Pleadings, Provided Claim Construction is Not at Issue

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

law 1063249 1920 | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

August 16, 2019

Liberal Application of Relation Back Doctrine Saved Infringement Claims from Being Time Barred

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Chemical Patents | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

August 14, 2019

Any Compound May Look Obvious Once Someone Has Made it, But Federal Circuit Rejects Convoluted Obviousness Argument

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

patent law litigation gavel | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

August 12, 2019

Board Erred in Failing to Apply § 112, Paragraph 6 to Mechanical Control Assembly

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness IP Technology Lawyers

August 12, 2019

Arguments Regarding Enablement Confirm Narrow Scope of Claims

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

roberto h 1156558 unsplash | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

May 30, 2019

Infringement was a Matter of Degree

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness IP IP Attorneys

May 30, 2019

Lack of All Substantial Rights Deprived Plaintiff of Statutory Standing, But Not Article III Standing

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey IP Litigators e1559051363276 | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

May 23, 2019

We Shall fight in the Fields and in the Streets, We Shall Fight in the Hills; We Shall Never Surrender.

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey Federal Circuit Litigation | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

May 21, 2019

Detailed Explanation and Corroboration Made “Sham Affidavit” Doctrine Inapplicable

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

pexels photo 207489 | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

May 15, 2019

The Written Description Must Provide More than A Mere Wish or Hope that the Invention Would Work

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

shutterstock 134284013 software error small | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

May 14, 2019

Patent’s Description Was Inconsistent with Patentee’s Claim Construction

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

law 1063249 1920 | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

May 13, 2019

Lack of Reasonable Expectation of Success Meant Claims Weren’t Obvious

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Federal Circuit Litigation | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

April 26, 2019

FDA Skepticism Supported Non-obviousness

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Posts pagination

Previous 1 … 5 6 7 … 10 Load more posts

Stay Current on all things IP by subscribing to our blog

Join

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
    • Sitemap
    • Privacy Statement
    • Legal Notice

  • © 2025 Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C. All rights reserved. H D & P