Harness IP
  • People
  • Global IP Services
    • Practice Areas
    • Industries
    • Case Studies
  • Blog
  • News & Awards
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 中國語
  • Client Login
  • 한국어
  • 日本語
  • 中國語

Blog

Stay Current on all things IP by subscribing to our blog

Join

Harness IP takes pride in our collective knowledge of intellectual property law and how it affects businesses and organizations across a range of industries. We also enjoy keeping up with the latest decisions from the prominent venues that affect IP law, including the Federal Circuit, the U.S. Supreme Court, and the PTAB. Our goal is to distill this knowledge into practical guidance that in-house counsel and others can use. We invite you to join our audience and enrich the discussion whenever possible. 

  • Litigation

      ALL CATEGORIES

      • Biologics & Biosimilars
        • FDA Guidance & Updates
      • BioPharma
      • Blockchain, Crypto, & Web 3.0
      • Chemistry & Nanotechnology
      • EDMO Patent Updates
      • Fitness IP
      • IP Management
      • IPR-PGR
      • Litigation
      • Patent Prosecution
      • quIPs
      • Trademarks
      • Uncategorized
  • Authors
    • Caley BennettCaley Bennett 2
    • Jewell N. BriggsJewell N. Briggs 8
    • John A. Castellano, IIIJohn A. Castellano, III 1
    • Christopher M. CaubleChristopher M. Cauble 5
    • Matthew L. CutlerMatthew L. Cutler 202
    • Keith P. DriscollKeith P. Driscoll 1
    • Nicholas S. DrysdaleNicholas S. Drysdale 7
    • Monte L. FalcoffMonte L. Falcoff 3
    • Jeremiah J. FoleyJeremiah J. Foley 1
    • Glenn E. ForbisGlenn E. Forbis 12
    • Charlie Franklin, Ph.D.Charlie Franklin, Ph.D. 1
    • Alexandra M. FuchsAlexandra M. Fuchs 2
    • Michael GambleMichael Gamble 1
    • Jordyn GraweJordyn Grawe 10
    • Jason A. HeistJason A. Heist 1
    • Paul R. HofferPaul R. Hoffer 2
    • Michael P. KellaMichael P. Kella 4
    • Hemant M. KeskarHemant M. Keskar 4
    • Sung Pil KimSung Pil Kim 1
    • Elisabeth A. KoralElisabeth A. Koral 11
    • Kisuk LeeKisuk Lee 2
    • J. Bradley (Brad) LuchsingerJ. Bradley (Brad) Luchsinger 1
    • Chris K. MillerChris K. Miller 1
    • Leanne M. RakersLeanne M. Rakers 36
    • Douglas A. RobinsonDouglas A. Robinson 18
    • Joel R. SamuelsJoel R. Samuels 16
    • Mark A. SpinelliMark A. Spinelli 1
    • David L. SuterDavid L. Suter 2
    • Michael L. TaylorMichael L. Taylor 1
    • Jennifer R. TurchynJennifer R. Turchyn 4
    • David P. UtykanskiDavid P. Utykanski 1
    • Michael VarcoMichael Varco 4
    • Joseph E. Walsh, Jr.Joseph E. Walsh, Jr. 4
    • Andrew M. WaxmanAndrew M. Waxman 2
    • Bryan K. WheelockBryan K. Wheelock 720
    • Kaylynn WilliamsonKaylynn Williamson 1
    • Jennifer M. Woodside WojtalaJennifer M. Woodside Wojtala 12
    • Scott E. YackeyScott E. Yackey 1
  • The Hypocrisy of ‘Delete IP’

    May 13, 2025

    The Hypocrisy of ‘Delete IP’: Billionaire Frustrations Masquerading as Policy

    More

  • Xencor Jepson claim

    May 12, 2025

    A Path to Antibody Protection

    More

  • DMCA Takedown notice

    May 1, 2025

    A DMCA Takedown notice is a powerful tool if done correctly.

    More

  • CLS Newsletter

    April 4, 2025

    U.S. Chemical & Life Science Patents Quarterly Newsletter

    More

  • Patent infringement

    April 1, 2025

    Do You Have a Patent Infringement Problem?

    More

  • Protecting-Your-Cannabis-Brands_Harness-IP

    January 2, 2025

    Navigating Complex Federal Regulations When Protecting Your Cannabis Brands

    More

August 22, 2011

CyberSource v. Retail Decisions, Inc.

By:

August 11, 2011

CAFC MYRIAD DECISION: This is Not a “Gene Patent” Case

By:

June 17, 2011

Does the Federal Circuit “mean” it this time? Adding confusion to when claim language lacking the word “means” should be subject to means-plus-function analysis.

By:

June 17, 2011

A possibility among a limited number is not necessarily a predictable solution; teaching away need not be specific.

By:

June 10, 2011

Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Limited Partnership, U.S., No. 10-290 (June 9, 2011).

By:

June 10, 2011

Stanford v. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.

By:

June 2, 2011

Global-Tech Appliances, Inc. v. SEB SA – The Supreme Court Addresses Inducement of Patent Infringement

By:

April 25, 2011

TiVo Inc. v. Echostar Corp.

By:

April 18, 2011

Federal Circuit Overturns Precedential BPAI Opinion, Allows Reissue Only to Add Dependent Claims

By:

April 8, 2011

Innovention Toys, LLC, V. MGA Entertainment, Inc.

By:

April 8, 2011

THE ORAL ARGUMENT IN MYRIAD, April 4th, 2011

By:

March 17, 2011

IS THE END IN SIGHT FOR PATENT MISMARKING CLAIMS?

By:

June 30, 2010

Bilski’s Claims Unpatentable Abstract Ideas; Machine-or-Transformation a Useful, Not Exclusive Test for Patentable Subject Matter

By:

June 21, 2010

Another Case (Surprisingly) of First Impression for the Federal Circuit

By:

May 11, 2010

“First Sale” Doctrine Does Not Apply When There Is a Likelihood of Post-Purchase Confusion

By:

February 22, 2010

Failure to Properly Preserve and Search for ESI Results in Monetary Sanctions and Spoliation Jury Instructions

By:

January 11, 2010

Wyeth v. Kappos

By:

December 9, 2009

Federal Circuit’s Holding that Patent Did Not Transfer to Plaintiff Prompts Dissent to Deliver a Lecture on Contract Law

By:

December 7, 2009

Federal Circuit Holds that Implied Assertions of Patent Rights are Sufficient to Give Rise to Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction

By:

December 2, 2009

Claims To Methods Of Managing Bulk E-Mail Distribution To Groups Of Targeted Consumers Obvious Based On “Common Sense”

By:

Posts pagination

Previous 1 … 8 9 10 Load more posts

Stay Current on all things IP by subscribing to our blog

Join

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
    • Sitemap
    • Privacy Statement
    • Legal Notice
  • © 2025 Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C. All rights reserved. H D & P