Harness IP
  • People
  • Global IP Services
    • Practice Areas
    • Industries
    • Case Studies
  • Blog
  • News & Awards
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 中國語
  • Client Login
  • 한국어
  • 日本語
  • 中國語

Blog

Stay Current on all things IP by subscribing to our blog

Join

Harness IP takes pride in our collective knowledge of intellectual property law and how it affects businesses and organizations across a range of industries. We also enjoy keeping up with the latest decisions from the prominent venues that affect IP law, including the Federal Circuit, the U.S. Supreme Court, and the PTAB. Our goal is to distill this knowledge into practical guidance that in-house counsel and others can use. We invite you to join our audience and enrich the discussion whenever possible. 

  • All Categories

      ALL CATEGORIES

      • Biologics & Biosimilars
        • FDA Guidance & Updates
      • BioPharma
      • Blockchain, Crypto, & Web 3.0
      • Chemistry & Nanotechnology
      • EDMO Patent Updates
      • Fitness IP
      • IP Management
      • IPR-PGR
      • Litigation
      • Patent Prosecution
      • quIPs
      • Trademarks
      • Uncategorized
  • Authors
    • Caley BennettCaley Bennett 3
    • Jewell N. BriggsJewell N. Briggs 8
    • John A. Castellano, IIIJohn A. Castellano, III 1
    • Christopher M. CaubleChristopher M. Cauble 5
    • Christopher R. ClaytonChristopher R. Clayton 1
    • Matthew L. CutlerMatthew L. Cutler 202
    • Keith P. DriscollKeith P. Driscoll 1
    • Nicholas S. DrysdaleNicholas S. Drysdale 7
    • Monte L. FalcoffMonte L. Falcoff 3
    • Jeremiah J. FoleyJeremiah J. Foley 1
    • Glenn E. ForbisGlenn E. Forbis 12
    • Charlie Franklin, Ph.D.Charlie Franklin, Ph.D. 1
    • Alexandra M. FuchsAlexandra M. Fuchs 3
    • Michael GambleMichael Gamble 1
    • Jordyn GraweJordyn Grawe 11
    • Jason A. HeistJason A. Heist 1
    • Paul R. HofferPaul R. Hoffer 3
    • Michael P. KellaMichael P. Kella 4
    • Hemant M. KeskarHemant M. Keskar 4
    • Sung Pil KimSung Pil Kim 1
    • Elisabeth A. KoralElisabeth A. Koral 12
    • Kisuk LeeKisuk Lee 4
    • Jeffrey LinJeffrey Lin 2
    • J. Bradley (Brad) LuchsingerJ. Bradley (Brad) Luchsinger 1
    • Chris K. MillerChris K. Miller 1
    • Leanne M. RakersLeanne M. Rakers 37
    • Douglas A. RobinsonDouglas A. Robinson 20
    • Joel R. SamuelsJoel R. Samuels 16
    • Mark A. SpinelliMark A. Spinelli 1
    • David L. SuterDavid L. Suter 2
    • Michael L. TaylorMichael L. Taylor 1
    • Jennifer R. TurchynJennifer R. Turchyn 4
    • David P. UtykanskiDavid P. Utykanski 2
    • Michael VarcoMichael Varco 5
    • Colette E. VerchColette E. Verch 1
    • Joseph E. Walsh, Jr.Joseph E. Walsh, Jr. 4
    • Andrew M. WaxmanAndrew M. Waxman 2
    • Bryan K. WheelockBryan K. Wheelock 720
    • Kaylynn WilliamsonKaylynn Williamson 1
    • Jennifer M. Woodside WojtalaJennifer M. Woodside Wojtala 12
    • Scott E. YackeyScott E. Yackey 1
  • CHEMICAL & LIFE SCIENCE PATENTS_Q2 CLS Newsletter

    July 7, 2025

    U.S. Chemical & Life Science Patents Q2 Newsletter

    More

  • 5 Federal Circuit Patent Cases You Need To Know

    June 30, 2025

    5 Federal Circuit Patent Cases You Need To Know

    More

  • Enablement, Anticipation, and Claim Strategy

    June 26, 2025

    Enablement, Anticipation, and Claim Strategy: Rethinking Biotech Patent Drafting Post-Agilent

    More

  • Six Actions to Take to Ensure Your Trade Secret Stays Secret

    June 23, 2025

    Six Actions to Take to Ensure Your Trade Secret Stays Secret

    More

  • GettyImages 2207660420 | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

    June 23, 2025

    Cannabis And Trademarks: Protecting Against Infringement

    More

  • The Hypocrisy of ‘Delete IP’

    May 13, 2025

    The Hypocrisy of ‘Delete IP’: Billionaire Frustrations Masquerading as Policy

    More

Harness Dickey Federal Circuit Litigation | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

September 12, 2019

Objective Indicia of Non-obviousness Supported PTAB’s Finding of Non-obviousness

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness IP IP Law & The Constitution

August 30, 2019

Celebrating Labor Day in Patents

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

US Patent Office Utility Patents | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

August 25, 2019

Trick Question: How Many Utility Patents has the USPTO Issued?

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

adult dark facial expression 428340 | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

August 20, 2019

Protect Your Intellectual Property or You’ll Lose Your Shirt

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

mage of cracked light bulb to denote IP legal dispute

August 16, 2019

Patent Eligibility Can be Determined on the Pleadings, Provided Claim Construction is Not at Issue

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

law 1063249 1920 | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

August 16, 2019

Liberal Application of Relation Back Doctrine Saved Infringement Claims from Being Time Barred

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Chemical Patents | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

August 14, 2019

Any Compound May Look Obvious Once Someone Has Made it, But Federal Circuit Rejects Convoluted Obviousness Argument

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

patent law litigation gavel | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

August 12, 2019

Board Erred in Failing to Apply § 112, Paragraph 6 to Mechanical Control Assembly

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness IP Technology Lawyers

August 12, 2019

Arguments Regarding Enablement Confirm Narrow Scope of Claims

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

BioPharma Patents | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

August 9, 2019

Merely Tangential Exception to Prosecution History Estoppel Saved Inartful Amendment from Barring Infringement by Equivalents

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness IP U.S. Supreme Court Patent Litigators

June 24, 2019

One Applicant Gets his Registration, but all Trademark Owners may be F-U-C-T

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

self inflating tire patent lawsuit 1 | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

June 24, 2019

Drafting Considerations after ChargePoint, Inc. v. SemaConnect, Inc.

By: Nicholas S. Drysdale, Principal

Trademark Enforcement Attorneys

June 18, 2019

How is the Likelihood of Confusion Analysis Different in Registration Decisions Versus Infringement Decisions?

By:

Harness IP Patent Attorneys Dallas Detroit St. Louis Washington, DC

June 18, 2019

Consider All of the Patent Family’s Prosecution History When Communicating with the USPTO

By: Jewell N. Briggs, Associate

Harness IP IP Litigation St. Louis

June 5, 2019

Form-seekers and Non-disclosure Agreements

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

shutterstock registered trademark 85 | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

June 4, 2019

Does Your Trademark Have a 401(k)?

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

roberto h 1156558 unsplash | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

May 30, 2019

Infringement was a Matter of Degree

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness IP IP Attorneys

May 30, 2019

Lack of All Substantial Rights Deprived Plaintiff of Statutory Standing, But Not Article III Standing

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey IP Litigators e1559051363276 | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

May 23, 2019

We Shall fight in the Fields and in the Streets, We Shall Fight in the Hills; We Shall Never Surrender.

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness Dickey Federal Circuit Litigation | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

May 21, 2019

Detailed Explanation and Corroboration Made “Sham Affidavit” Doctrine Inapplicable

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Posts pagination

Previous 1 … 14 15 16 … 60 Load more posts

Stay Current on all things IP by subscribing to our blog

Join

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
    • Sitemap
    • Privacy Statement
    • Legal Notice
  • © 2025 Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C. All rights reserved. H D & P