November 13, 2013
Matthew L. Cutler
Principal
St. Louis Metro Office
202 Recent Articles
November 07, 2013
Operability of Combined References Considered by PTAB in Obviousness Analysis
November 06, 2013
GAO Report: Looking for the Real Troll
November 05, 2013
PTAB Clarifies Procedure for Filing Supplemental Evidence in Response to Objections
November 04, 2013
Entry of Supplemental Evidence a Tough Hurdle to Navigate in IPR Proceedings
November 04, 2013
PTAB = Stickler on Detailed Inter Partes Review Rules
November 01, 2013
Deposition Parameters Start to Take Shape in Inter Partes Review Proceedings
October 31, 2013
Shoe Wars Reach PTAB as Inter Partes Review Brought by Adidas is Granted Against Nike Patent
October 30, 2013
Priority Date of Challenged Patent Sustained by Board, But IPR Trial Still Instituted on Other Grounds
October 29, 2013
Board Gives No Deference to District Court Litigation Claim Construction in Denying IPR Petition
October 28, 2013
PTAB’s Detailed Claim Construction Analyses Exemplified in Grant of Three IPR Petitions
October 24, 2013
Short-Shrift Analysis of Dependent Claims Costs Patent Challenger in Inter Partes Review Institution
October 23, 2013
Board’s Broad Reading of Claim Term Results in Institution of IPR Trial
October 17, 2013
Expert Opinion on Claim Construction Must Include Evidence to be Given Weight by PTAB
September 20, 2013
Overwhelming Prior Art Makes Board’s Job Easy in Grant of IPR Trial
September 18, 2013
1 Year of Inter Partes Review…By the Numbers
September 17, 2013
Board’s Claim Construction Limited to What it Needed To Initiate IPR Trial
September 16, 2013
Detailed Means-Plus-Function Analysis Underlies Board’s Decision to Institute Six Related IPR Trials
September 16, 2013
Testing that Proved Inherent Properties of Prior Art Accepted by Board
September 12, 2013