Harness IP
  • People
  • Global IP Services
    • Practice Areas
    • Industries
    • Case Studies
  • Blog
  • News & Awards
  • About Us
  • Careers
  • Contact Us
    • 한국어
    • 日本語
    • 中國語
  • Client Login
  • 한국어
  • 日本語
  • 中國語

Blog

Stay Current on all things IP by subscribing to our blog

Join

Harness IP takes pride in our collective knowledge of intellectual property law and how it affects businesses and organizations across a range of industries. We also enjoy keeping up with the latest decisions from the prominent venues that affect IP law, including the Federal Circuit, the U.S. Supreme Court, and the PTAB. Our goal is to distill this knowledge into practical guidance that in-house counsel and others can use. We invite you to join our audience and enrich the discussion whenever possible. 

  • Patent Prosecution

      ALL CATEGORIES

      • Biologics & Biosimilars
        • FDA Guidance & Updates
      • BioPharma
      • Blockchain, Crypto, & Web 3.0
      • Chemistry & Nanotechnology
      • EDMO Patent Updates
      • Fitness IP
      • IP Management
      • IPR-PGR
      • Litigation
      • Patent Prosecution
      • quIPs
      • Trademarks
      • Uncategorized
  • Authors
    • Caley BennettCaley Bennett 3
    • Jewell N. BriggsJewell N. Briggs 8
    • John A. Castellano, IIIJohn A. Castellano, III 1
    • Christopher M. CaubleChristopher M. Cauble 5
    • Christopher R. ClaytonChristopher R. Clayton 1
    • Matthew L. CutlerMatthew L. Cutler 202
    • Keith P. DriscollKeith P. Driscoll 1
    • Nicholas S. DrysdaleNicholas S. Drysdale 7
    • Monte L. FalcoffMonte L. Falcoff 3
    • Jeremiah J. FoleyJeremiah J. Foley 1
    • Glenn E. ForbisGlenn E. Forbis 12
    • Charlie Franklin, Ph.D.Charlie Franklin, Ph.D. 1
    • Alexandra M. FuchsAlexandra M. Fuchs 3
    • Michael GambleMichael Gamble 1
    • Jordyn GraweJordyn Grawe 11
    • Jason A. HeistJason A. Heist 1
    • Paul R. HofferPaul R. Hoffer 3
    • Michael P. KellaMichael P. Kella 4
    • Hemant M. KeskarHemant M. Keskar 4
    • Sung Pil KimSung Pil Kim 1
    • Elisabeth A. KoralElisabeth A. Koral 12
    • Kisuk LeeKisuk Lee 4
    • Jeffrey LinJeffrey Lin 2
    • J. Bradley (Brad) LuchsingerJ. Bradley (Brad) Luchsinger 1
    • Chris K. MillerChris K. Miller 1
    • Leanne M. RakersLeanne M. Rakers 37
    • Douglas A. RobinsonDouglas A. Robinson 20
    • Joel R. SamuelsJoel R. Samuels 16
    • Mark A. SpinelliMark A. Spinelli 1
    • David L. SuterDavid L. Suter 2
    • Michael L. TaylorMichael L. Taylor 1
    • Jennifer R. TurchynJennifer R. Turchyn 4
    • David P. UtykanskiDavid P. Utykanski 2
    • Michael VarcoMichael Varco 5
    • Colette E. VerchColette E. Verch 1
    • Joseph E. Walsh, Jr.Joseph E. Walsh, Jr. 4
    • Andrew M. WaxmanAndrew M. Waxman 2
    • Bryan K. WheelockBryan K. Wheelock 720
    • Kaylynn WilliamsonKaylynn Williamson 1
    • Jennifer M. Woodside WojtalaJennifer M. Woodside Wojtala 12
    • Scott E. YackeyScott E. Yackey 1
  • CHEMICAL & LIFE SCIENCE PATENTS_Q2 CLS Newsletter

    July 7, 2025

    U.S. Chemical & Life Science Patents Q2 Newsletter

    More

  • 5 Federal Circuit Patent Cases You Need To Know

    June 30, 2025

    5 Federal Circuit Patent Cases You Need To Know

    More

  • Enablement, Anticipation, and Claim Strategy

    June 26, 2025

    Enablement, Anticipation, and Claim Strategy: Rethinking Biotech Patent Drafting Post-Agilent

    More

  • Six Actions to Take to Ensure Your Trade Secret Stays Secret

    June 23, 2025

    Six Actions to Take to Ensure Your Trade Secret Stays Secret

    More

  • GettyImages 2207660420 | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

    June 23, 2025

    Cannabis And Trademarks: Protecting Against Infringement

    More

  • The Hypocrisy of ‘Delete IP’

    May 13, 2025

    The Hypocrisy of ‘Delete IP’: Billionaire Frustrations Masquerading as Policy

    More

May 10, 2017

Merely Because Petitioner Changes its Mind is not Enough to Stop Inter Partes Reexamination

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness IP Intellectual Property Attorneys

May 5, 2017

Semicolons Strongly Indicate Each Step is Separate and Distinct; Confuse Most Non-Patent Lawyers

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

May 5, 2017

Estoppel Under 317(b) Always Applies on a Claim by Claim Basis, Just Like the Statute Says

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

shutterstock 207063067 | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

May 1, 2017

A Sale Is Still a Sale under the AIA

By: Jennifer M. Woodside Wojtala, Principal

April 28, 2017

Lack of Proof That Infringement was “But For” Cause of Lost Sales or Price Erosion Defeats Permanent Injunction

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness IP IP Attorneys

April 28, 2017

A Claim to an Abstract Idea does not Automatically Become Eligible Merely by Adding a Mathematical Formula

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

shutterstock court with gavel | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

April 21, 2017

§317(b) Resurrects Claims Invalidated in Reexamination, That Were Found Not Invalid in Litigation

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

shutterstock 240614686 small e1453910269364 | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

April 19, 2017

IPR Estoppel: Ripe for Gamesmanship?

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness IP Intellectual Property Attorneys

April 19, 2017

Little Words That Can Make a Big Difference: i.e. Versus e.g.

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

April 17, 2017

Issue Preclusion: Patent Owner Does Not Get a Do Over to Assert the Claims Against Similar Products

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

shutterstock court with gavel | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

April 17, 2017

Failure of Licensee to Mark May Upend $15.7 Million Damage Award

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

April 13, 2017

An Omitted Inventor Can’t Correct Inventorship of a Patent Owned by a Government Agency

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

shutterstock 137408126 Binders in Laptop | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

April 13, 2017

Trust but Verify – When Speculation and Assertion Are Not Enough

By:

Harness IP Intellectual Property Lawyers

April 12, 2017

Just Because the Board Didn’t Say It, Doesn’t Mean that the Board Didn’t Think It

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Confused Business Man | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

April 11, 2017

When is a Missing Feature Not There?

By:

shutterstock court with gavel | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

April 7, 2017

Don’t Exalt Slogans over Real Meaning; Find the Claim Construction that Naturally Aligns with the Specification and Prosecution History

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

shutterstock 240614686 small e1453910269364 | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

April 2, 2017

Dependent Claims Were Anticipated While Independent Claims Were Not

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

March 27, 2017

Prior Art that Must be Distorted from its Obvious Design Does Not Anticipate

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Harness IP Intellectual Property Lawyers

March 23, 2017

Inventorship Claims That Took $8 Million to Defeat Were Not “Exceptional”

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

shutterstock late dice | Intellectual Property Law Firm | Harness IP

March 21, 2017

Patent Owner Cannot Create New Claim Construction Issues After the Jury Verdict

By: Bryan K. Wheelock, Principal

Posts pagination

Previous 1 … 10 11 12 … 23 Load more posts

Stay Current on all things IP by subscribing to our blog

Join

  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
    • Sitemap
    • Privacy Statement
    • Legal Notice

  • © 2025 Harness, Dickey & Pierce, P.L.C. All rights reserved. H D & P